Communication

Click for a printable summary of IB internal assessment requirements.

You can view annotated samples of Internal Assessments here.  ​​

This criterion assesses whether the investigation is presented and reported in a way that supports effective communication of the focus, process and outcomes.

Presentation:

• A consistent linguistic style is maintained throughout the writing.

• No spelling or grammar errors are present.

• Written in past tense with good paragraph structure.

• Legible font style and size are used.

• Use of color in images or graphs is appropriate.

• Citations given for all material taken from sources.

Structure:

• There are clear headings for each section, with consistent formatting.

• Graphs, tables, images sequentially titled (i.e. “Figure 1…”).

• Graphs, tables and images included as close as possible to its first reference.

• Tables and graphs do not break across pages.

• Parenthetical in-text references/citations are given in consistent format.

• A Works Cited List with consistent formatting is given at the end of the report.

• Sources are written in alphabetical order by author’s last name.

• Paper is 6-12 pages in length (examiners are not required to read anything over 12 pages).

Focus:

• All data, graphs and images are relevant to the research question.

• All citations are relevant to the research question.

• All analysis and discussion are relevant to the research question.

​Terminology & Conventions:​

• Tables are well organized, with specific and clear title, headings and units.

• Table column headers are present and correct (MV in first column).

• Graphs are well organized, with specific and clear titles, labeled axis (with unit) and appropriately scaled axis.

• Images annotated with captions to add information of value to the investigation.

• Avoid excessive use of jargon.

• Non-standard technical terms are explained and used in the correct context.